Scope as an enforced boundary, not a promise

Most engagements state a scope and trust everyone to honour it. We made the system check every target and log the verdict instead.

What we set out to answer

Every engagement raises the same underlying question in a different shape: can a claim be trusted? Our answer is structural rather than rhetorical.

Observation, hypothesis, evidence and conclusion are kept separate — always.

How it works in practice

• Every target is checked against scope before any action.
• Artefacts are hashed on capture and chained together.
• A conclusion links back to the evidence that supports it, or it is not published.

The result is a report where provenance is the default, not an add-on requested by a nervous stakeholder.