The line between an assistant that helps you research and one that takes actions on your behalf is the whole security story. Where we drew it, and why.
What we set out to answer
Every engagement raises the same underlying question in a different shape: can a claim be trusted? Our answer is structural rather than rhetorical.
Observation, hypothesis, evidence and conclusion are kept separate — always.
How it works in practice
- Every target is checked against scope before any action.
- Artefacts are hashed on capture and chained together.
- A conclusion links back to the evidence that supports it, or it is not published.
The result is a report where provenance is the default, not an add-on requested by a nervous stakeholder.